January 14th, 2014

Is There A Formula For A Good Book?

From A.V. Club:

On January 8, Inside Science reported that computer scientists at Stony Brook University had designed an algorithm allowing them to determine what makes a novel a success. The results are eerily precise. Among the traits most likely to make a book well reviewed and widely read are an unadorned, journalistic style; higher numbers of nouns and adjectives; and lower numbers of adverbs and verbs.

Thankfully, literature is not a science. Yet the writing and selling of literature increasingly is. Thanks to a proliferation of analytics, it’s easier than ever for publishers to track, graph, and therefore do their desperate best to predict market trends. Judged on that cold scale of downloaded units, Mein Kampf—which has come roaring back recently thanks to a high volume of e-book sales—might now be considered a good book.

I won’t go so far as to say that reducing the richness of books to ones and zeroes, and then judging them on such a scale, is tantamount to literary eugenics. But it does raise a question about what it means for a book to be formulaic, and whether that’s a good or bad thing. Or whether those kinds of questions even mean anything anymore.

Click here to read the rest of this story. 

  1. guntersvillepl reblogged this from chicagopubliclibrary
  2. kaktus-roza reblogged this from libraryphantomg5
  3. libraryphantomg5 reblogged this from chicagopubliclibrary
  4. iamthehappiest reblogged this from chicagopubliclibrary
  5. slybloo reblogged this from chicagopubliclibrary
  6. misseley40 reblogged this from chicagopubliclibrary
  7. keithpeligro reblogged this from uicspecialcollections
  8. uicspecialcollections reblogged this from chicagopubliclibrary and added:
    Science! What do you all think?
  9. allyourthursdays reblogged this from niezuviele
  10. lollisheep reblogged this from coolwicked
  11. coolwicked reblogged this from niezuviele
  12. niezuviele reblogged this from chicagopubliclibrary
  13. rebelstardom reblogged this from chicagopubliclibrary
  14. wcdpl reblogged this from chicagopubliclibrary
  15. youmagicalbastard reblogged this from chicagopubliclibrary
  16. assjb4 reblogged this from chicagopubliclibrary
  17. wendiferous reblogged this from icecadenza
  18. icecadenza reblogged this from chicagopubliclibrary
  19. violetcurmudgeon reblogged this from chicagopubliclibrary
  20. mixtapemontage reblogged this from chicagopubliclibrary and added:
    The formula for a good book is an anglerfish? This has Nerdfighteria written all over it.
  21. squirrelconspiracy reblogged this from chicagopubliclibrary
  22. heychamone reblogged this from chicagopubliclibrary
  23. shellylynn reblogged this from chicagopubliclibrary
  24. chicagopubliclibrary posted this
Loading tweets...

@CPL_NWYT